Search for: "Little v State"
Results 761 - 780
of 26,837
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
” In reality, Rule 1.8.5(a) does state the general bar on such payments. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Winter was coming, as it does. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
As such, it is entitled to little weight as a matter of stare decisis. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:40 am
The Sedlik v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:07 am
Ford: Maybe you could tell us a little bit about the legal structure around who has rights to water and whether or not that structure makes sense, given the contemporary challenges we face. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
McPherson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am
Consider that a trap for the unwary, because the members’ capital accounts might have little relation to the actual value of the business (especially if many years have passed between the execution of the operating agreement and the capital call). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 2:48 am
” (See Brownell v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
”He argued that Batson has done “little to stop discrimination in the use of preemptory strikes. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
The contractor may need to revise its method of allocating indirect costs if, as the result of changed circumstances, that method no longer distributes costs to contracts in proportion to the benefit received.[14] This may occur where there has been a significant change in factors such as the nature of the business, the extent of subcontracting, the volume of sales and production, manufacturing processes, the contractors products or services, or other relevant circumstances.[15] The FAR affords… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Rampart Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:49 am
With respect to the state court cases, the defendants failed to submit evidence establishing, prima facie, the absence of at least one essential element of the legal malpractice cause of action (see Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldamn & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d 544, 545; Fricano v Law Offs. of Tisha Adams, 194 AD3d 1016, 1018). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In the arguments, the justices focused little on the facts of the current case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:41 am
However, a September 2019 New York State intermediate appellate court decision – Vega v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:26 am
Fricke Memorials, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:54 am
By this time the case was called Chevron v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
That rule likely comes out of the pirate days, and okay, I can get on board for it.But, here, the facts seem a little different. [read post]
