Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The Cases of the Day, NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:00 pm
In In re Lord Abbett Mutual Funds Fee Litigation, 2009 WL 117002 (3rd Cir. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The Supreme Court It is incumbent on the state to establish any wrongdoing. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:14 am
As the the Court themselves stated:"We are conscious that in so deciding we are arriving at a conclusion which is different from that of an experienced patent judge. [read post]
COVID-19 Daily Insurance Regulatory Updates To Keep You Informed During The Lockdown (July 24, 2020)
24 Jul 2020, 3:13 pm
Ward, who yesterday ordered coordination of Tambellini v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 2:28 am
Lord Neuberger gave a short concurring judgment. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am
R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
Further, four members of the House of Lords in OBG Ltd v Allen had emphasized the need to confine the tort within careful limits. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
” Following the ceremony, Mr Sumption will be styled Lord Sumption, and will begin sitting on Thursday 12 January, among a panel of five Justices hearing the shipping dispute case of Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. v E.N.E. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 1:26 am
Quick links House of Lords: Lords private members’ bills ballot 2024, Paul Magrath, ICLR: Changes to Neutral Citations for Family Court and Court of Protection. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Lastly, Lord Justice Clark dismissed Popplewell J’s third reason above by stating “I do not regard the validity of my interpretation to be impugned because there is an element of tautology” and “I do not regard his erratic use of the comma as any real guide to meaning. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
This devolution jurisdiction was first exercised by the Privy Council to rule on allegations of Convention rights violations by the prosecution in both solemn procedure (Montgomery v HMA 2001 SC (PC) 1, 19 October 2000) and summary criminal procedure (Brown v Stott 2001 SC (PC) 43, 5 December 2000). [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
The court also considered the specific strand of authority concerning legally privileged documents disclosed by mistake, sometimes called the Ashburton v Pape jurisdiction (after Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
’[12] The Court of Appeal have stated that ‘where children are affected the state is subject to an obligation to relieve poverty if “necessary to allow family life to continue. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 pm
The case of ABC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society… [read post]
