Search for: "Lynch v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 1,740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Rodriguez-Dod, The Intersection of Law, Religion, and Infectious Disease on the Handling and Disposition of Human Remains, (Law, Religion, and Health in the United States (Holly Fernandez Lynch, I. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:45 pm by EEM
Lynch, "the California case challenging the Obama Administration’s practice of detaining immigrant families and unaccompanied minors. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:02 pm by Joseph Margulies
They supported the Klan after Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Here's a flavor of the Second Circuit's (Calabresi, Lynch and Lohier) reasoning:[Defendant] argues that the closure ordered by the state trial court, which permitted certain family members to remain in the courtroom and stated that other members of the public might be permitted to attend upon request, was broader than necessary to protect those interests. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:40 am by David Markus
"  That's from Althouse discussing the 4th Circuit case of Bauer v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by Donald Thompson
 In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by New York Criminal Defense
 In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Williams's Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement before Roe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Because no authority clearly established that the police officer’s interest in speech as a union officer attacking the police chief’s competence as chief outweighed the chief’s governmental interest in effective administration of her department, she was entitled to summary judgment based on qualified immunity (Lynch v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:05 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That is what the Court of Appeals is telling us in a ruling that vacates a conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm.The case is United States v. [read post]