Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 761 - 780
of 914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
In that case, Lord Coleridge CJ famously said that an Act could not have "intended that the girls for whose protection it was passed, should be punished under it for the offences committed against themselves". [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
But I'm getting ahead of myself - first, the facts and judgment. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
But I'm getting ahead of myself - first, the facts and judgment. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 3:13 am
I'm not entirely sure of the point of such a list, but nevertheless here is my selection, in no particular order: 1. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:58 pm
As far as I'm aware, this is the first time a court has squarely ruled that there is no DMCA safe harbor from an inducement claim; as I noted, the court in the UMG v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552, and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
The House of Lords decision in Jones v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 5:16 pm
Ottawa Citizen and the 2006 House of Lord's decision, Jameel v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 5:06 pm
Ottawa Citizen and the 2006 House of Lord's decision, Jameel v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:33 pm
The Court: The good Lord may know you didn't do it, but he didn't speak to the folks on the jury, I'm afraid. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 4:01 am
The Supreme Court has handed down judgment in the case of R (A) v Croydon and R (M) v Lambeth [2009] UKSC 8. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 4:01 am
The Supreme Court has handed down judgment in the case of R (A) v Croydon and R (M) v Lambeth [2009] UKSC 8. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:19 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 12:17 am
Instead I went to lunch with some other lawyers in the firm who felt they needed to take pity on me for my wasted 40 minute drive, all of them telling me in response to the unprofessional behavior of their king: "I'm not surprised. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 8:18 pm
I'm one of those folks who thinks that Santa Fe Independent School District v. [read post]
