Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A J R"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,716
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
L.P.A., Dayton, for Appellees Jim Neer and Gregory Stites Lynne R. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:23 am
Except as limited by a constitutional prohibition agreed to by the People, the States are free to adopt whatever laws they like, even those that offend the esteemed Justices’ “reasoned judgment. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
” Id. at 955 (Sotomayor, J., concurring). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:33 am
Nancy J. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Prenuptial agreements don’t matter until the marriage is at an endpoint. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 11:26 am
., [page254] Dickson J. adopted the purposive method of Charter interpretation and observed that the interests engaged by s. 8 are not simply an extension of the concept of trespass, but rather are grounded in an independent right to privacy held by all citizens. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
Also there is mandatory referral of both criminal matters and civil matters. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm
” Id. slip op. at 1 (dissenting opinion, Roberts, J.). [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
It claims that M.C. is the mother of all three children “as a matter of biological fact,” when the law (and probably science as well) cares only about genetic ties between parent and child. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
The defendants argued that, in terms of r 5.17 of High Court Rules and s 7 of the Defamation Act 1992— each communication of defamatory matter is a separate actionable publication; multiple causes of action must be pleaded separately, each delineated by some introductory phrase; it must be made clear upon which particular pleaded facts each cause of action is based; a separate remedy must be sought for each cause of action; and provision by the plaintiff of further… [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
Adopt an appropriate shareholder engagement policy; know your shareholders. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 3:24 pm
So, with that prologue, why does it matter, from a government contracts perspective, what form the deal takes? [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
In the following guest post from John Reed Stark, President, John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, and David R. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:10 pm
Frady, No. 13-cv-1262-J-34JBT (Mar. 31, 2015) (rejecting Nosal)). [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:06 am
” (Matter of Fassa Corp., 31 Misc.3d 782 (2011) quoting Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 133 [Fisher, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part].) [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
-K, and has been adopted in a few other jurisdictions since then. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:04 am
Attorney Phillip J. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
” “Denial of [registered trademark] benefits creates a serious disincentive to adopt a mark which the government may deem offensive or disparaging…. 2. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
This matters. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm
APA rulemaking could thus provide necessary equitable relief to all three deserving parties (the adjustment applicant and Employer #1 on the one hand, and Employer # 2 on the other) by adopting some variant of the “cell mitosis” theory I proposed in Musings. [read post]
