Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 761 - 780 of 20,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2008, 8:28 am
  Mukasey makes the distinction between legal advice and policy advice, and suggests that a lawyer sometimes permits clients to do things that the lawyer wishes the client wouldn't do.Remarks by Attorney General Michael B. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 am by Steve Lombardi
While this may be just a J-O-B to you, we aren't S-T-U-P-I-D. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This is also corroborated by the second paragraph on page 2 of the application […] according to which the device according to the invention is suitable for segregating both liquids and solid particles from gases generated in any type of device.Incidentally, it is noted that the German application (DE 102004006834 A1) the priority of which is claimed by the present application has been classified also in the higher-ranking class B04C 5/24 by the DPMA.Board of appeal decision T 542/00,… [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:07 am by Jim Chen
An antitrust plaintiff that clears the Rule 12(b)(6) hurdle has shown antitrust injury and has satisfied both Twombly and Trinko. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm by oliver randl
A source of solace for the appellant’s attorneyThe decision on this appeal against the revocation of the opposed patent by the Opposition Division contains two interesting passages.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:A disposable absorbent article in the form of a diaper having an absorbent structure comprising an absorbent core (3) which is coated with absorbent sheets (3A, 3B) to thereby form the absorbent structure and disposed between a liquid pervious sheet (1) and a… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Said: death of the author/the reader matters at least as much/more. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 8:10 pm by Jamie Markham
It matters, of course, because absconding is one of the few things for which a person may be revoked after Justice Reinvestment. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am by Jacquelyn Greene
The Juvenile Code defines a custodian in the context of a delinquency matter as “[t]he person or agency that has been awarded legal custody of a juvenile by a court. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Still get broader scope in TM no matter what b/c of infringement standard. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 5:50 am
Prudente (the fellow who went to jail for having a brown lawn) and it didn't matter to Andy either. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The subject-matter of claim 1 is not restricted to a specific method of applying the vital dye. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 9:24 am
  But the First holds that it won't order a vacatur of the judgment below, because that would be reaching the merits. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The EBA has noted further that “[T]o restrict the application of R 28(c) (formerly R 23d(c)) to what an applicant chooses explicitly to put in his claim would have the undesirable consequence of making avoidance of the patenting prohibition merely a matter of clever and skilful drafting of such claims” (see point [22] of the Reasons). [21] The present Board does not see any reason to apply this approach of decision G 2/06 to the situation underlying present claim 1. [read post]