Search for: "MATTER OF N A" Results 761 - 780 of 16,738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2023, 12:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
A New Hampshire law protects speech by government employees, but is limited to the "right to publicly discuss and give opinions as an individual on all matters concerning any government entity and its policies. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Henry P Yang
This is Trial E, one of the six related trials between Optis and Apple. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
Shaver in the review and refinement of arguments related to subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 1:16 pm by Paige Waters, Stephanie O’Neill Macro
Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), John Thune (R-SD), Roger Wicker (R-MS), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), and Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), introduced the bipartisan Senate Artificial Intelligence Research, Innovation, and Accountability Act establishing “a framework to bolster innovation while bringing greater transparency, accountability, and security to the development and operation of the highest-impact applications of AI. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:01 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
For the court, this alone is not sufficient to establish the author’s own intellectual creation, even when only the ‘small coin’ threshold is required.The court stated that the situations at issue with ‘Vaccinated, chipped, dewormed’ is similar to the seminal ruling in ‘Wir fahr’n, fahr’n, fahr’n auf der Autobahn’ (‘We drive, drive, drive on the highway’). [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm by Aaron Moss
To make matters worse, La Dart didn’t represent herself. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Television Comm'n (5th Cir. 1982), which concluded that in Pico "the Supreme Court decided neither the extent nor, indeed, the existence [or nonexistence], of First Amendment implications in a school book removal case," because "[t]he Fifth Member of the Court [Justice White] voting for the judgment expresses no opinion on the First Amendment issues. [read post]
” Lastly, Justice Brian Hagedorn stated in his dissent that “[n]o matter how today’s decision is sold, it can be boiled down to this: the court finds the tenuous legal hook it was looking for to achieve its ultimate goal——the redistribution of political power in Wisconsin. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The cases will also test how much a 58-year-old landmark of the civil rights era still matters. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 8:21 am by kblocher@hslf.org
It defines T-N-R as nonlethal population control, offering defense against prosecution for returning T-N-R cats to outdoor homes. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
[N]egligent supervision claims against a religious institution violate the First Amendment because they require a court to evaluate “what the church ‘should know. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm by Maria Hook
As a matter of statutory interpretation, the Court of Appeal considered that “[o]n its face the Act applies, and there is no good reason to read it more narrowly” (at [76]). [read post]