Search for: "MATTER OF TRUST B UNDER LAST WILL"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Michael B. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Michael B. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
John B. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
Lemley: innovation often goes along w/having to take a license b/c of patent threats. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:00 pm
Human rights due diligence: key features and why it matters A. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Obama decision, which “held that ‘[t]he determination of when hostilities have ceased is a political decision, and we defer to the Executive’s opinion on the matter, at least in the absence of an authoritative congressional declaration purporting to terminate the war,’” as well as the D.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:27 am
B. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am
Legal and policy venues exist to address these; the Office need not worry about enabling behavior that’s illegal under other laws b/c it will still be illegal. [read post]
9 May 2012, 2:46 am
A party that believes that it has been treated unfairly will not trust the trickster a second time. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Section 413 provides: No action may be commenced under this subchapter with respect to a fiduciary’s breach of any responsibility, duty, or obligation under this part, or with respect to a violation of this part, after the earlier of: (1) six years after (A) the date of the last action which constituted a part of the breach or violation, or (B) in the case of an omission the latest date on which the fiduciary could have cured the breach or violation, or (2)… [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 8:05 am
Over the last six months, working on CCPA policy matters and spending a little time in Sacramento, I have learned that everything that happens in Sacramento is very political. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
In the eminent domain context, we surely could not trust property owners to answer honestly. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 5:53 am
If you can’t hear the sarcasm while reading that last line, trust me—it’s there. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
Exceptions may apply, including for stock repurchases: occurring in connection with certain non-taxable corporate reorganizations; by regulated investment companies and real estate investment trusts; not exceeding $1 million in aggregate during the taxable year; and to the extent treated as a dividend. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
Restoring Trust, Transparency and Accountability Act, 2018 (Bill 57) On December 6, 2018, the Restoring Trust, Transparency and Accountability Act, 2018 (Bill 57) received Royal Assent. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
This is important because when a district court considers such evidence in a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) it can make some credibility determinations that might require denial of a Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:05 pm
We agree that this potentially gives the case some heightened public significance, although whether it will attract public attention is a matter of speculation. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
The bar association says that under the law, clients cannot put retainers in trust accounts. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Furthermore, Justice Kennedy asserted that only the SEC and not private parties were authorized under US. securities law to bring claims for aiding and abetting liability, that is, not by private parties. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:04 pm
And once that happens, there’s got to be a way for a lawyer and client to explore their personal relationship without causing the whole firm to lose the client or the client to lose trusted representation.And if you tell lawyers and clients that they just can not under any circumstances have sex together… well, then all that’s going to happen is you’ll have more lawyers and clients lying to the bar and their partners, trying to keep relationships… [read post]
