Search for: "Marine v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 2,911
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2018, 3:12 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The inviolability of documents which are part of a mission archive under arts 24 and 27(2) of the VCDR makes it impermissible to use such documents (or copies) in a domestic court of the host country, absent extraordinary circumstances such as state security, or express waiver from the mission state. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm by Amanda Pickens
Ceres Marine Terminals Inc., No. 2:18-cv-00192 (D.S.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm by David Wright
Ceres Marine Terminals Inc., No. 2:18-cv-00192 (D.S.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm by David Wright
Ceres Marine Terminals Inc., No. 2:18-cv-00192 (D.S.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Julia Solomon-Strauss, Stephen Szrom
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 8:44 pm by Aurora Barnes
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. 17-972 Issue: Whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Atlantic Marine Construction Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:42 am by Anthony Gaughan
As Justice Brennan noted in his concurring opinion in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm by Patrick Reagin
The stage appears to be set for intervention by the United States Supreme Court following the Ninth Circuit’s recent panel decision in Batterton v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm by Liskow & Lewis
The stage appears to be set for intervention by the United States Supreme Court following the Ninth Circuit’s recent panel decision in Batterton v. [read post]