Search for: "Matter of Investigative Grand Jury Proceedings"
Results 761 - 780
of 819
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2008, 4:09 am
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS Factual Background On March 23, 1983, Lisa DeCarr and Kathy Stevens wereexpelled from school after they were discovered outside smoking under a tree. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 2:18 pm
the IRS has acquired information directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer from a criminal enforcement action (e.g., search warrant, grand jury subpoena). [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
ejudicially instructed the jury that it had to find him guilty. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
This became embedded in grand jury practice by the 1900s. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:44 am
The charges against the Defendant were changed after it was heard by a Grand Jury. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:44 am
In addition, the grand jury criticized the office for failing to create a central index containing the names of jailhouse informants and the cases in which they testified. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Kuehne, No. 06-3668 A conviction for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) allegedly improper venue; 2) the definition of "use" under 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1); 3) jury instruction regarding proof necessary for conviction under section 924(c); 4) constructive amendment or variance of the indictment; 5) prosecutorial misconduct; 6) a motion for acquittal; 7) alleged inaccuracies in the transcript of proceedings; 8) propriety of… [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 3:58 pm
If you are concerned that you are the target of an investigation or you believe that you may implicate yourself or a loved one in a criminal matter, it may be in your best interest to retain a New York criminal defense attorney to accompany you to the Grand Jury. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
For the reasons that follow, the summary judgment rulings on these two claims are vacated and the matter remanded for further proceedings. 08a0350p.062008/09/19 USA v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Mukasey, No. 072311 In an immigration matter in which petitioner was charged by Department of Homeland Security with removability as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony after admission, removal order is vacated where: 1) informal agreement between petitioner's parents to share legal custody was entitled to effect; and 2) Child Citizenship Act of 2000 requirement that, at the time the statute went into effect, petitioner was "in the legal...custody of the citizen… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:07 pm
(He blamed State Farm for those who are in bad health, and said he is considering suing the company over this and opening a grand jury investigation, possibly involving the Rigsby sisters as star witnesses). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:07 pm
(He blamed State Farm for those who are in bad health, and said he is considering suing the company over this and opening a grand jury investigation, possibly involving the Rigsby sisters as star witnesses). [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
To interpret section 3292 to require notice or a hearing for a defendant "would be to ignore the traditionallynon-adversarial and secret nature of grand jury investigations. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
In 1999, the Evansville Police Department reopened the investigation. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:42 am
DeGeorge, 219 F.3d at 937.Neither does the ex parte nature of the application violate the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause.Because § 3292 applications must be made before the return of an indictment, ex parte applications are consistent with the traditionally non-adversarial and secret nature of grand jury proceedings. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
y it matters in light of a concurrently running longer sentence. . [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Genao-Sanchez, No. 05-1402 Sentence for drug conspiracy, conspiring to use a firearm in furtherance of a drug conspiracy, and aiding and abetting the commission of a crime, is vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court's failure to convene a new sentencing hearing deprived defendant the opportunity to argue his position both as to matters of fact relevant to sentencing, and as to the appropriate sentence to be imposed; and 2) thus, the error was prejudicial. [read post]
12 May 2008, 10:48 pm
As a result, this is likely to be a lengthy proceeding and it may not be possible to discuss your case with the prosecutor prior to having the matter called before the Judge. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Gill , No. 07-0284 Sentence for making false statements relating to a health care matter is affirmed where the district court did not error conditions of supervised release: 1) preventing defendant from engaging in the business of counseling for the period of supervision; and 2) requiring defendant to make restitution payments in connection with a prior conviction until the financial obligation is paid in full. [read post]
