Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 761 - 780
of 16,406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
Mark Martins, says his side’s review continues apace. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 11:09 pm
Nonetheless, many major brands, such as Louis Vuitton, have found the process of providing evidence of acquired distinctiveness challenging, eventually failing to receive trade mark protection (Louis Vuitton – Damier Azur, T-275/21, commented on The IPKat here). [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:14 am
The question is "whether consumers will perceive matter in the mark as a flag. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
"If respondent is using the FLANAX mark in the United States to misrepresent to U.S. consumers the source of respondent’s products as petitioner’s Mexican products, it is petitioner who loses the ability to control its reputation and thus suffers damage. *** [T]he record in this case clearly establishes that the reputation of the Mexican FLANAX mark does not stop at the Mexican border. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:58 pm
And I'd mark this up to their credit: in their private desolation at least they don't seem to have allowed themselves to get spun by a spin doctor. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:34 am
The district court’s other reasons for ruling against Fleischer were that the uses here weren’t uses of a mark in commerce and weren’t likely to cause confusion. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 6:39 am
However, the clear representation of the subject matter is not the only requirement to successfully obtain an EU trade mark registration. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
And it’s no use using your creative spelling variations such as FUK or SH*T, the USPTO isn’t going to be fooled or lenient. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 8:58 am
One may, however, wonder whether a difference can be made, as a matter of principle, between EU and EEA country names on the one hand and those of other regions on the other. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:22 am
Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: How sweet it isn't. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:18 am
Because, of course, with the decision T‑368/20 of 16 June 2021, the General Court set the same standard for Ronaldo’s own trademark. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
For reformers: focusing on certification mark rules won’t matter if most certification happens in TMs. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:58 am
” This article by Natalie Posgate and Mark Curriden is a well written summary of the matter. [read post]
17 May 2018, 10:00 pm
The idea is that two marks, no matter how similar, are generally unlikely to confuse a consumer as to the source of a good or service when they are used in entirely different contexts. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
And it isn’t. [read post]
24 May 2009, 4:38 pm
Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Toea Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1443 So far as I am aware, this didn’t go on appeal. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 11:03 pm
It doesn't matter. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 10:43 am
We do not comment on matters of national security. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 9:07 am
But she caught me on the counter (It wasn’t me) Saw me banging on the sofa (It wasn’t me) I even had her in the shower (It wasn’t me)She even caught me on camera (It wasn’t me) She saw the marks on my shoulder (It wasn’t me) Heard the words that I told her (It wasn’t me) Heard the scream get louder (It wasn’t me) – Shaggy (2000) U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
That case concerned only Section 2(a)'s prohibition of registration of marks containing scandalous matter. [read post]
