Search for: "Matter of Stanford" Results 761 - 780 of 2,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 9:29 am
" One hopes that editors generally strive for this, but without anonymous submission procedures, this ideal remains largely a matter of hope and faith.Yale, Harvard, and Stanford incorporate anonymity to at least some degree. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:34 am by Carolyn Elefant
Even a Stanford Law Review article noted that in cases where federal judges perceived a disparity in the quality of representation (mostly civil rights and immigration matters on the civil side), they overwhelmingly found the solo/small firm lawyer to be the more deficient (See Report and Discussion at Table 8). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:45 am by CBA Futures
Perry, a law student in Toronto, suggests it’s a matter of “abolishing/redesigning what the user has come to despise about the legal profession. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
" According to Stanford political scientist Morris Fiorina, it probably cost the Democrats at least six seats in the House (including Speaker Tom Foley from Eastern Washington and Jack Brooks, the long-time Texan head of the House Judiciary Committee), not to mention dooming the candidacy of Rep. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:08 pm
The Chronicle also discusses the movie Stealing Harvard, about a character who pilfers money to pay the tuition, which was originally called Stealing Stanford until that school objected. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:11 pm by Morgan Weiland
Let me explain how this article matters to the community of scholars and policymakers in media, culture, and communication. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:24 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Conflicts Between the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act, 48 Stanford Journal of International Law 47, 89-90 (2012). [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:50 am by Astarita
Erhardt received a M.A. from the University of Notre Dame, a M.S. in Management from Stanford University, and a B.A. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
In the matter of Peacock, heard 14 December 2011. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 5:00 am by Paulina Borsook
Lewis was far less critical about his subject matter than he has always been about the machinations of Wall Street. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:48 am by Eric Goldman
by guest blogger Marketa Trimble At the recent “Law, Borders, and Speech” conference at Stanford, several participants debated the relevance of server location in determining jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:59 pm by Ryan McLane
  Most of you probably click “Agree” without reading the fine print or giving the matter a second thought. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Steve Lubet
No matter what certain psychiatrists have opined. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 11:20 am by Ron Coleman
Jeanne Fromer asks, in the Stanford Law Review: What do a trendy kosher restaurant in SoHo, an independent movie about a serial killer, and a Swiss watchmaker have in common? [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:26 am by William Ford
The Stanford Law & Policy Review is a widely cited academic journal at Stanford Law School that explores current issues at the nexus of law and public policy. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am by William Ford
The Stanford Law & Policy Review is a widely cited academic journal at Stanford Law School that explores current issues at the nexus of law and public policy. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:55 am by William Ford
The Stanford Law & Policy Review is a widely cited academic journal at Stanford Law School that explores current issues at the nexus of law and public policy. [read post]