Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,564
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm
The action involves patients at a maximum security health centre between 1966-1983, by patients in the Social Therapy Unit (STU) involving controversial treatment that included mind-altering drugs, isolation cells, hallucinogenic drugs, and a strict disciplinary regime, Tactics included verbally aggressive communication and patient-on-patient p [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
Security Council about how to respond to the Trump administration’s effort to reimpose sanctions on Iran. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 6:45 am
United StatesJordahl v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
The suit, Texas Democratic Party et al v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am
In Baldassi & Others v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
See HERE.The Second Draft text follows and may be accessed HERE. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
Golden Door Properties, LLC et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:03 pm
Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 1:36 pm
Supreme Court decision in Mcgirt v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
” While it acknowledged the examples cited by supporters of the CFPB, such as the single Administrator of the Social Security Administration (SSA) and sole officer of the Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), the Court concluded that the examples are relatively recent and extremely controversial. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 1:07 pm
(See Ralls Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
As this term’s decision in Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:35 am
Trump v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
In the event of controversies related to both fractions, the authors, performers or producers of the phonogram, or holders of respective rights, may exercise civil actions and repair the damage, in accordance with the provisions of articles 213 and 216 bis. of this Law, independently to the penal and administrative actions that proceed. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm
” It follows the Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada discussed the Act in Dagg v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Department of Homeland Security, for allegedly arresting and detaining Portland residents illegally. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 8:51 pm
DeVries v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
(That political will may have been put in some doubt in much of the world over the past year or so.) [read post]
