Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 3:52 pm
Right now, the United States Congress is facing a fundamental decision about how it will handle mass surveillance confirmed by the Snowden disclosures. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:49 am
In other words, virtually every major publicly traded user-generated content company, representing nine of the top 10 United States websites as ranked by Alexa, spoke in support of TheDirty. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-11-30: Google Scholar link to AUTHORS GUILD, INC. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:23 am
Accolade, Sony v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
It was originally scheduled for November 8.This week the United States Department of Justice and the European Commission cleared the Microsoft-Nokia deal, and the England and Wales High Court entered a UK injunction against various HTC devices including the One mini. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:46 am
On Monday it became known that the United States Department of Justice (DoJ) unconditionally approved Microsoft's acquisition of Nokia's wireless devices business. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:33 am
Nokia just received good news yesterday in the United States, where Microsoft's acquisition of Nokia's wireless devices business received fast-track clearance from antitrust regulators. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
InterDigital Commc’ns v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:56 am
(See Moss v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:16 pm
The Supreme Court opinion in Christianson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
AvePoint, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Microsoft (B.C.C.A., April 15, 2011) (34282) Oct. 31, 13 The S.C.C. held: Indirect purchasers have a cause of action against the overcharging party. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
United Food and Commercial Workers 2013 SCC 6 http://t.co/OPLOlzT06I -> Alberta PIPA violates Charter says Supreme Court in IPC v United Food and Commercial Workers http://t.co/EPnrm3qITA -> Union can videotape picket line, Supreme Court rules in privacy case http://t.co/vdMUJQFhOD -> Alberta PIPA violates Charter says Supreme Court in IPC v United Food and Commercial Workers: The Supreme Cour… http://t.co/Azw7DJyO1U -> SCC Strikes… [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington has certified a partial final judgment (this post continues below the document): 13-11-12 Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 7:09 am
The plaintiff worked for Microsoft Libya as a marketing lead in Tripoli, Libya, until a revolution erupted and he was evacuated to the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
Some argue that an eBay v. [read post]