Search for: "Monroe v. Monroe" Results 761 - 780 of 1,176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2014, 4:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In October 2005 and February 2006 YK brought actions, subsequently consolidated, against Monroe County, JD and others, alleging serious injury under New York's No–Fault Law. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 1:16 am by INFORRM
Sewell v Monroe City School Board 18-31086, a case considering an annual Medicare Health provider compensation formula, where two provisions of the law irreconcilably conflict but judges wish to construct faithfully to the text of the statute. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
  There is one appeal listed for January 2018 30 January 2018, Stocker v Stocker Permission Applications Applications for permission to appeal in the following case are awaiting decisions by the single judge Monroe v Hopkins Guise v Shah Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers Denman v Associated Newspapers There is an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court by some of the defendant which is pending in the case… [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 6:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to plaintiffs’ eighth cause of action, for malpractice, “[i]t is well established that, ‘[t]o recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia, the existence of an attorney-client relationship’ ” (Spring v County of Monroe, 151 AD3d 1694, 1695 [4th Dept 2017]; see Berry v Utica Natl. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Ct., Monroe County 2004]  ), such a withdrawal does mandate a dissolution unless it is found that “it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business” (Horning v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:07 am
Monroe Superior Court IV, 444 N.E.2d 1178, 1180 (Ind. 1983). [read post]