Search for: "Murray v. Murray" Results 761 - 780 of 1,800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2015, 11:32 am by James Fox
  Also on the panel, Melissa Murray discussed the forgotten contraception case of Trubek v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:52 am
On this point, Tomlinson J referred to FNCB v Barnet Devanney [1999] Lloyd's Rep IR 459 at 468 and to Talbot Underwriting v Nausch Hogan & Murray [2006] 2 Lloyd's Rep 195 at 218 that established that it was the duty of a broker to obtain, as far as is possible, insurance coverage which clearly meets his client's requirements. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 9:49 pm by Simon Gibbs
Murray Heining, Chairman of the Association of Costs Lawyers, recently commented on this issue and repeated the comments of Dyson LJ (as he then was) in Buxton v Mills-Owens [2010] 1 WLR 1997: “[the solicitors] were under a professional duty not to include in the court documents that they drafted any contention which they did not consider to be properly arguable and not to instruct counsel to advance contentions which they did not consider to be properly arguable. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:31 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Michelle Canter of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings on the firm’s blog, Financial Services Perspectives Getting Permission: FAA Proposes New Regulations to Legalize Drone Scouting – Omaha, Nebraska attorney Sean Minahan of Lamson, Dugan and Murray on his blog, the Midwest Agricultural Law Guide How Does the King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Gama Endustri Tesisleri Imalat Montaj AS v Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment [2005] IEHC 119 (22 April 2005) (Kelly J), Cogley v Radio Telifís Eireann [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005) (Clarke J) and Murray v Newsgroup Newspapers [2010] IEHC 248 (Irvine J) are all to similar effect. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:49 am
C) Who did Judge Murray Klein lose to (tricky question). [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION CLAIM OF: DON BIRCH v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:21 pm
Rule — Sabey Rule LLP, KelownaUsing Unjust Enrichment as a Remedy in Estate Litigationcurrent state of the lawwhen is this remedy most effective to pleadelements of unjust enrichmentjoint family ventures after Kerr v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"Also in the Times is a review of Speak Now: Marriage Equality on Trial: The Story of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Returning to Khuja, the majority took the view that A v BBC turned on very particular facts and did not represent a departure from the approach taken in Re S  and Re Guardian News and Media, which was endorsed in A v BBC [28]. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  He considered the various factors set out in Murray v Express Newspapers plc [2009] Ch 481 [35] holding that “by far the weightiest factor leading to my conclusion that the Claimant does have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the Information is the final factor: the circumstances in which and the purposes for which the information came into the hands of the publisher” [125](ii). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, plaintiff’s allegation that Bellinson’s advice denied him the full value of his malpractice suit against Pepperman was “purely conclusory” (Murray Hill Invs. v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 305 AD2d 228, 229 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]