Search for: "New Doe Child #1 v. United States"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
That's the part of the Bankruptcy Code that makes your phone stop ringing and lawsuits stop coming when you file a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Arizona.It's a pretty complicated piece of legislation, and it's fundamentally different from the versions of stays which existed under the Bankruptcy Act (the version of the bankruptcy law that we had in the United States prior to what bankruptcy lawyers called the New Code prior to the 2005 Amendments. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437 (17 June 2011): Court of Appeal: By 2-1 majority (Lord Justice Laws dissenting) Ban on tobacco sales through automatic vending machines was lawful. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
From Momotaz v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 12:32 am
The specific grounds:(1) The studies Dr. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 10:38 am
Those forms of status confer legal permission to remain in the United States on a range of foreign nationals, including nonimmigrants, such as tourists and students, and immigrants, such as 1) close family members of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents and 2) persons approved for skilled jobs that U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents are not interested in filling. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
United States, 509 U.S. 544, 550, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993), quoting M. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:00 am
Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005) (downloaded files copied from servers or directly from peer-to-peer network); United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
June 1); In re Chmura, 608 N.W.2d 31, 40 (Mich. 2000); Mahan v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 5:25 pm
More children in the United States are online than ever before. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
United State [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:00 am
United States12-978Issue: Whether, when a prisoner’s first federal habeas motion results in the entry of a new sentencing judgment, a subsequent habeas motion is “second or successive,” within the meaning of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Press Gazette has commentary, as does the Guardian and INFORRM. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
States Power Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
The New ConstitutionChapter 5. [read post]
