Search for: "New York v. Connecticut" Results 761 - 780 of 1,721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2014, 12:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Divorce Lawyer said X and his sister, M, testified in favor of X's petition. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:16 am by Epstein Becker Green
  On July 5, 2014, New York became the twenty-first state along with the District of Columbia to legalize marijuana use for certain medical conditions—joining Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
    On June 25, 2014, New York Attorney General Eric T. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:55 am by Lindsay J. Jarusiewicz
In fact, numerous jurisdictions, including New Jersey, New York City, Alaska, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Texas, Minnesota and West Virginia have already enacted pregnancy accommodation laws, and similar legislation is on the horizon for a number of other jurisdictions. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
MANITOBA HYDRO SD New York 2014http://t.co/crmWOit5DI -> No reasonable expectation of privacy in IP address US v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
In 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the federal appeals court for Connecticut, New York and Vermont, reversed the conviction of a man named Raghubir Gupta, who was convicted of immigration fraud. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
In 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the federal appeals court for Connecticut, New York and Vermont, reversed the conviction of a man named Raghubir Gupta, who was convicted of immigration fraud. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
MANITOBA HYDRO SD New York 2014http://t.co/crmWOit5DI -> No reasonable expectation of privacy in IP address US v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am by John Eastman
”  The New York Times even editorialized that the decision granted “owners of closely held, for-profit companies an unprecedented right to impose their religious views on employees. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:27 am
Gojcaj, supra.Gojcaj “subsequently traveled to Bedford, New York. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
The court undertook a state-by-state analysis of all 22 states – Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida (citing a case we sent to Westlaw), Georgia, Illinois (rejecting Dolin v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:26 am
Today’s New York Times editorializes on yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in UARG v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Our offices are conveniently located throughout New York City and we offer free consultations. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:37 am by Bill Ward
See Order Granting Motion to Dismiss, Bank of New York Mellon v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York 2014). [read post]