Search for: "O’CONNOR V. STATE"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
On this day 36 years ago, President Ronald Reagan announced that he would appoint Sandra Day O’Connor to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
In a fractured opinion written by Chief Justice O’Connor, in which Justices O’Donnell and Kennedy concurred in judgment only and Justice Pfeifer dissented, the court held that the foreseeability instruction given in this medical negligence case should not have been given, but was not prejudicial error, and reversed the court of appeals on this point. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:15 am
At Constitution Daily Abigail Perkiss marks the 12th anniversary of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s retirement and looks at O’Connor’s legacy “as both the first female justice and as a critical swing vote on an increasingly politicized Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
The Court’s 2000 holding in Bush v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:09 am
In her dissent, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor did not challenge the authority Congress has within the Spending Clause. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
In Matal v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
” Chief Justice O’Connor, to counsel for the Putative Father On June 21, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of In the Matter of: The Adoption of P.L.H., 2107-0173. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:04 am
United States (1992), Justice Sandra Day O’Connor found that a federal waste-management law "would 'commandeer' state governments into the service of federal regulatory purposes, and would for this reason be inconsistent with the Constitution's division of authority between federal and state governments. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
Soon before she left the court, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor spoke eloquently of the need for the separation of church and state when she wrote: “Those who would renegotiate the boundaries between church and state must therefore answer a difficult question: Why would we trade a system that has served us so well for one that has served others so poorly? [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
These two points are made clear in both the main opinion by Justice Stevens and in the concurrence by Justice O’Connor (which Chief Justice Rehnquist joined). [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:56 am
In her dissent, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor criticized the abandonment of a “long-held, basic limitation on government power. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:34 am
O’Connor. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:56 am
Chief Justice William Rehnquist dissented, along with John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O’Connor, and Byron White. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:02 am
The Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:55 am
* What will happen to other states’ sex offender restriction laws? [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:20 am
O’Connor v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:15 am
But Chief Justice William Renquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Clarence Thomas wrote separate concurrences, stating that requiring teachers to lead the Pledge was constitutional. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
”) Lehr v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:15 pm
” “I sought Justice O’Connor’s advice,” Ginsburg continued. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:04 pm
” 542 U.S. 296, 314 (2004) (O’Connor, J., dissenting). [read post]
