Search for: "Organ v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 20,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2015, 10:43 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin The CFPB’s constitutionality is back before the D.C. federal district court, with the private plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Brittany Blakey In City of San Mateo, et al v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm by Patricia Hughes
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Vilsack, that a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) guidance document, intended to provide guidance with respect to the Organic Foods Act, was a legislative rule, not merely an interpretive statement of agency policy. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm by Karen Breda
Amicus briefs were filed by the  United States Department of Justice, the Bristol County Bar Advocates and various advocacy organizations, Harvard Immigration & Refugee Clinical Program, Boston University Criminal Clinic Defenders and more than thirty law professors (including BCLS's Kari Hong). [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 12:09 am
A competency determination, reasoned the court, was different and the state court was reasonable in so deciding.US v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by David Ardia
This is part V in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  It also would require time to organize and hold such elections, which ALEC and its allies clearly do not intend to provide. [read post]
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:36 am by Eric Goldman
The court says Yelp’s website constitutes a public forum (but only in the anti-SLAPP sense, not the state action sense, a point made in the uncited Prager U v. [read post]