Search for: "Pack v. Doe" Results 761 - 780 of 1,576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
 Thus, as Jacob LJ explained in Actavis v Merck at [75], such a claim "is not aimed at and does not touch the doctor - it is directed at the manufacturer. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:02 pm
In the Flores case, a noticeably drunk customer was sold alcoholic beverages, specifically a 12 pack of beer, at a convenience store. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:47 am by Daniel Cappetta
Moreover, there is not really any question that the defendant was using it in a dangerous manner – it was in his back pack and the article specifically states that it does not appear to have been used. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:53 pm by Bexis
(trochar)     Deposition2000-01-16 Doe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
' will elicit the same answer from everyone, but it does not on that account produce an ‘involuntary' response.[19]Where the Henn court thought the question of voluntariness turned is the following: (1) if the person receives information about the consequences of his choices; (2) if the choice is free from fraud or other misconduct; and, (3) if the person has an opportunity to say no.[20] The Henn court further state that:[T]he fact that he still found the… [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am by Stephen Griffin
  From my point of view, this does not involve endorsing originalism for the reasons stated in previous posts. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:41 pm by Barry Barnett
Thompson, 94 S.W.3d 550, 557-58 (Tex. 2002); Pack v. [read post]