Search for: "Parker v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
V. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
V. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:12 am
United States, 283 F.2d 430 (9th Cir.1960) (threat of damage to property was made merely by mentioning troubles that other contractors had had); People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
CMS states that contractors may set thresholds for the number of services allowed before medical review, but may not limit the number of services provided. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:20 pm
Nev. 2006); accord Parker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:54 am
In Matter of Kaur v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:27 am
Parker, 425 F.3d 250, 268 (6th Cir. 2005) (Martin, J., dissenting). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:04 am
As reported in most of the main news outlets this morning, the Administrative Court, wearing the face of Mr Justice Kenneth Parker, handed down its judgment yesterday in R (on the Application of British Telecommunications Plc & TalkTalk Telecom Group Plc) v The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2011] EWHC 1021 (Admin), concerning BT and TalkTalk's application for judicial review of the Digital Economy Act 2010. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:17 am
The anti-patent-right-expansion policy of Deepsouth was repeated in Parker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
The case is styled, Texas Farmers Insurance Company v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 8:54 am
" That is the implication of Parker v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:08 am
In Parker v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:08 am
In Parker v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
” Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am
At Reason, Jacob Sullum discusses the questions about the constitutionality of warrantless electronic surveillance left open by United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Like this one.The case is McFadden v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
The State alleged that this further search revealed 38,000 additional names and identifying information.Minassian v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 5,643,446 entitled FUEL FILTER AND PRIMING PUMP and owned by Parker-Hannifan. [read post]
