Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Williams" Results 761 - 780 of 1,059
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
Whether urban legends, deceptive marketing, or beliefs held by raw milk proponents under a siege mentality, there are more microbiological and nutritional myths about raw milk than nearly any other food.After reviewing the myths, I looked for information from scientists and consumer advocates and busted the Top Ten 21st Century Raw Milk Myths. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Bexis
Feb. 16, 1996) (“[g]iven the lack of evidence that [the prescriber] ever consulted or relied on defendants’ package insert warnings in treating plaintiff, it cannot be said that those warnings played any role in the doctor’s decision to prescribe”); William Beaumont Hospital v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
(Part 1) http://bit.ly/vZBx4k (Tom Mighell) A Proposal for Preservation Rule Amendments - http://bit.ly/nQ7Jzq (William Wallace Belt) A World of Copyright Confusion on the Web - http://bit.ly/qpGVEW (Craig Smith) ABA Formal Opinion 11-460 is at Odds With Stengart v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:08 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Attorney's Off. v William T. (2011 NY Slip Op 07339 [3d Dept 10/20/11]) the Appellate Division, Third Department reversed a County Court order which granted an ex parte application, made on behalf of the prosecutor and police department involved in a pending out of state prosecution, to unseal the records from a dismissed and sealed prior case for use in the pending criminal proceedings. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
  Instead, this list was most interesting for the cases in which it denied review – including Williams v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am by Joshua Matz
Carver reports on a speech given by General William Suter, the Clerk of the Court, at Texas Tech Law School last Friday. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In Pennsylvania last year, the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Renchenski v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
The Rogers test had been applied in cases when the appropriation of a celebrity likeness created a false and misleading impression that the celebrity was endorsing a product.As explained in Seale v. [read post]