Search for: "People v Davis"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
Speaking of presidential elections, Mitt Romney has famously observed that corporations are people, too. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
D, Iain Sharp, Michael Allan Martin Davies, Denis Mazeaud, Albert A. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has opined (see, e.g., Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
“It’s a very small town where everybody knows everybody, apparently, or many people know many people,” Justice Elena Kagan says to Johnson. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
Davis and Personnel Director v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:02 pm
Original post from November 10, 2011: The Supreme Court recently granted cert in Magner v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 1:40 pm
The Ninth Circuit issued its opinion today in Davis v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm
A little over a year ago, in Ramos v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Jubelirer (in 2004) and Gaffney v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
This is the Court’s first exclusionary rule case since Davis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
Constructive abandonment is routinely defined as the refusal of one spouse to engage in sexual relations with the other spouse for one or more years, when such refusal is unjustified, willful, and continual, and despite repeated requests for the resumption of sexual relations (see Davis v Davis, 71 AD3d 13 [2d Dept 2009]; Gianis v Gianis, 67 AD3d 963 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
, and (2) Are corporations people? [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Davis v Johnson (1978) Susan Edwards49. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze the essential issues raised in Spokeo v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:54 am
Is this guy trying to match wits with Kim Davis over in Kentucky? [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
Shaw's clearly established constitutional rights were violated – constitutional rights that were set forth in the seminal case of Farmer v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
In Smith v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
Martin Davie, Reflections of an Anglican Theologian: Would a Provincial solution require Parliamentary approval? [read post]
