Search for: "People v Peters" Results 761 - 780 of 2,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
Peter Stanley sued stating that he was entitled to a hearing on the subject of who would have custody of children that were his. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
This works to bury the sovereign debt owed to First Nations Peoples and licenses the accumulation of further debt through criminalisation of Aboriginal people and the licensing of extractive violence against their lands and waters. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Neither, says the judge in patent and trade mark case Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK; Schutz UK Ltd, Schutz GmbH & Co KgAA v Delta Containers Ltd (PatLit) EWHC: RIM v Visto: Mr Justice Arnold takes charge (PatLit) Banking brand values plummet (IAM)   United States   US General  Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:12 am
The Stanford Law Review has an interesting series of articles on privacy in its most recent edition: A Reasonableness Approach to Searches After the Jones GPS Tracking Case by Peter Swire In the oral argument this fall in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Hamilton, 59 F.3d 1058, 1073 (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute); People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
The ICO has issued a reprimand to West Midlands Police after the force repeatedly mixed up two people’s personal information. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Peter DiCola: White-Smithisn’t as clean as that either. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In People v Trabazo [193 Misc.2d 436] (180 Misc 2d 961 [Crim Ct, Queens County 1999]), it was held that these limitations on superior courts were sound procedural mechanisms. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 9:05 pm
A portion of the travel and accommodation expenses of selected participants will be covered by the conference.Scientific Committee:Lisa Herzog (Institut für Sozialforschung der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat)Claire Lemercier (Centre de Sociologie des Organisations de Sciences Po)Anne Peters (Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht)Emmanuelle Tourme-Jouannet (Ecole de droit de Sciences Po)Organisational Committee:Filipe… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]