Search for: "People v Poole"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 7:21 pm
Enter the office pool. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In her January 31, 2014 decision in Morille-Hinds v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
(Rob Bonta, Press Releases: Worker-Owned Job Creation on the Rise: Assemblymembers Bonta and Levine Introduce Limited Liability Worker Cooperative Act to Facilitate Worker-Owned Business Development Feb. 24, 2014).What makes this proposal interesting is its extension of limited asset partitioning (limited liability) to risk taking individuals who wish to pool their labor. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:35 am
No summary judgment.A critical case for a huge number of people in Southern California. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
Moreover, it is of course the case that CSLI has no connection at all to the reason people use cellular telephones. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
He says, for example, drawing on the gender-based peremptory case, J.E.B. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
It is estimated that 250,000 people die each year in the United States as a result of medical malpractice according to the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm
The test, however, is nothing new — it’s based on the 1977 decision by 8th Circuit in Green v Missouri Pacific Railroad. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Poole, 742 F.Supp. 2d 3323, although the Third Department decision in People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:41 am
”A contemporary three-bedroomed apartment in Palgrave, one of the newest residential blocks at the V&A Waterfront. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
Beyond the accredited investor verification requirements noted above, the SEC has proposed several additional new rules in connection with Rule 506(c) offerings, including (i) requiring an “advance” Form D filing at least 15 days before generally soliciting; (ii) requiring a “closing amendment” to Form D at the conclusion of the offering; (iii) temporarily requiring funds to submit all general solicitation materials to the SEC in advance of their use; (iv) mandating that… [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:33 am
Recently in Dos Santos v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
The one time it came before for the Court was in Gallagher v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:12 am
Conventional thinking would have us believe that it’s just about home-ownership v. social renting v. private renting but the way people live still by-passes these rigid, stale unimaginative parameters. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
And in Dayco (Canada) Limited v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm
A pool of experts waits. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:38 am
This will be one of the largest jury pools in the history of Colorado. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
In People v. [read post]
