Search for: "People v. Ball" Results 761 - 780 of 1,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:33 am by Howard Wasserman
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm by Sandy Levinson
” If one were writing a latter-day Gilbert and Sullivan ditty about "people who would not be missed," Norquist would surely be a strong candidate to head the list. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:50 am by Adam Wagner
In the year to 31 March 2010, 85,557 people were examined using Schedule 7 powers. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 10:15 pm by royblack
His most famous speech comes from the case of Burden v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:29 pm by Ari Waldman
Would the severability clause – which, a friend reminded me, is not always sacroscant (United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:44 am by admin
”     Jackson adds: “We made friends with the conservation and planning people. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:59 am by Kevin
The published opinion I referred to in my earlier post, United States v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm by Michael Scutt
 As many people know, the maximum compensatory award that can be made for unfair dismissal by an Employment Tribunal is currently £68,400 (less at the time Ms Shoesmith was dismissed). [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:45 pm by Scott Nelson
Collusive class settlements allow corporations (when they can find class action lawyers who are willing to play ball with them) to cut off the claims of large numbers of people for a fraction of their real value. [read post]