Search for: "People v. Church"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Just as the biblical prophets indicted people for violating the terms of their fundamental national covenant (between God and Israel), so those who use the term “bigot” are condemning people who violate the terms of our national covenant, the Constitution. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
AT&TFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
We all know people who take a joke just a little too far. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Forthcoming lecture on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank Aston Law School has organised a lecture by Mark Hill KC to be given at the parish church of St John the Baptist, Aston Cantlow, on Monday, 4 September, on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, the leading case on chancel repair liability. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm
Trump and Hawaii v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
* For over a decade, I’ve implored people to stop using the term “Soft IP. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am
(I believe that it should, as do most people who have studied the issue.) [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:11 am
Consider that conservatives have won all of the major church-state decisions in the last decade, outside same-sex marriage: Hosanna-Tabor, Hobby-Lobby, Town of Greece—and before that, ACSTO v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:23 pm
In the most recent discussion of Elane Photography v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 6:50 pm
In Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:54 pm
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE People v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Exemptions wherever the tiny Native American Church needed them! [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:47 am
But by awarding all the property to the people least able to maintain it and keep using it for church purposes, he took "neutral principles of law" to a truly Pyrrhic level. [read post]
