Search for: "People v. English" Results 761 - 780 of 2,923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2011, 10:47 pm
The Family Proceedings Rules (now the Family Procedure Rules) were specifically amended to allow people in her position to do so. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:15 am by Jennifer Davis
” He also cited the earlier Court ruling in a similar case, Fletcher v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
One of the significant common features of Grosse v Purvis, Doe v ABC and Doe v Yahoo! [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:11 pm by Adeline Chong
It is noteworthy that in March 2022, Shanghai Maritime Court ruled to recognize and enforce an English judgment in Spar Shipping v Grand China Logistics (2018) Hu 72 Xie Wai Ren No.1, marking the first time that an English monetary judgment has been enforced in China based on reciprocity. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Tobias Thienel
It certainly offends Article 6 ECHR, and the Convention has been regarded as part of the English and a European ordre public (Loizidou v Turkey (Article 50), para 48; In re J [2005] UKHL 40, [2006] 1 AC 80, para 44); the Convention is also, in any event, based also on age-old rules of English law (cf. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am by CMS
  The FTT considered that the words in List B are not “specialist terms” but instead have “ordinary English meanings”. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 1:50 pm
BoltonYou'll notice there are a few English cases in the mix, but they are ones that, I think, are nonetheless, classics of American common law, generally because of their entrenchment in the American 1L curriculum.Also, you'll notice I have not included any U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Adam Wagner
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
The officers were sending messages in their free time from their personal electronic devices, which most people would surely see as a prima facie “private” activity. [read post]