Search for: "People v. Fields" Results 761 - 780 of 5,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2015, 1:53 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The number of people answering "not in favor" to Gallup's poorly worded basic question is the highest it has been since before Furman v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm by Benjamin Pollard
A Russian missile strike killed at least 13 people and injured 11 others in southern Ukraine. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 4:40 am by Tom Kosakowski
The internship offers an excellent exposure to a growing Ombuds program and the chance to acquire significant experience working with USDA Ombuds, Joanne Dea.The Secretary of Agriculture created the Office of the Ombudsperson as part of the Keepseagle v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:51 am by Liisa Speaker
The issue of operating a vehicle while internally possessing marijuana pursuant to the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act (“MMMA”) was tackled this week by the Michigan Supreme Court in its review of People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm by Shea Denning
Satchell, 489 P.2d 1361, 1370 (Cal. 1971) overruled on other grounds by People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
People who work in particularly competitive fields or hold senior positions where they are privy to their employer’s confidential information may find that their employment contracts contain a non-solicitation or non-compete clause that limits their ability to work for a competitor employer following their termination or departure. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
People who work in particularly competitive fields or hold senior positions where they are privy to their employer’s confidential information may find that their employment contracts contain a non-solicitation or non-compete clause that limits their ability to work for a competitor employer following their termination or departure. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:31 am
  I didn't want people in my field to say, "Oh, right. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Reasoning by analogy to the court’s decision in People v LeGrand, which dealt with expert testimony on eyewitness identification, defense counsel argued that the judge should at a minimum hold a Frye hearing on the admissibility of Dr. [read post]