Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 761 - 780
of 40,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2010, 2:31 pm
" See, Gardner v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:22 pm
The theme for today's opinions from the California Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit may revolve around the duality of man.Take Daniel Landry. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:29 pm
(Thankfully: It's a sunny 80+ degrees and sunny here in San Diego, and is one of those February days that makes me thankful to be alive -- and in SoCal.)But just because the California judiciary may be (officially) taking a break doesn't mean I can't tell them that they should take on some extra work. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:43 pm
But I think it's a tough question how far the police are able to go when all they have on you is that you're carrying a personal amount of weed, which may well be -- and in the vast majority of case, is (I suspect) -- legal under California law. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:26 pm
In this case, shorter and simpler may have also been better. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
" Otherwise the gynecologist is also guilty, for they surely perform the physical movements of the act, and voluntarily so.The erroneous instruction here may well be harmless, because there was no evidence that Mr. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:55 pm
To use his words: "Foreign objects may be of varying degrees of size, shape, or texture, and thus present potential dangers to a minor’s genitals or anal opening greater than simple consensual intercourse. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 7:24 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:06 am
The rationale for this was noted in McKee v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:40 pm
The narrowness of Jones may seem to make it an insignificant way station on the road to more definitive rulings – but it turns out there may be more to Jones after all. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 8:07 am
I understand that different people -- and different cultures -- may have varying approaches to the issue.Nonetheless, personally, I wouldn't want to be the individual remembered by history as one who filed a federal lawsuit and fought hard in an attempt to make cockfighting legal in the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands.Particularly since he loses. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:26 am
May 12, 2010) This lawsuit bummed me out. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:10 am
Which just goes to show that just because a law is written that says X, everyone may still do Y -- thousands of times a day, for years -- until someone actually bothers to read and interpret the actual statute.Mind you, I'm not sure that typical police practices will change anytime soon. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:50 pm
That may make for a good internet startup in the old days, but I didn't realize that dispensaries were "upside down" in this fashion.Plus I thought it was interesting that the dispensary here apparently sold weed for above market costs, which I had always thought was opposite of how these things generally worked. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 10:31 am
" Then, in May 2005, after nine extensions, it's: "Now we're making it November 2005. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 2:23 pm
In Forest Grove School Dist. v. [read post]