Search for: "People v. Root" Results 761 - 780 of 2,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 5:24 pm by Hua Wang
  What in my mind gave me permission to go was the Root-Tilden Scholarship at NYU. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 9:54 pm
Several people have told IPKat team member Jeremy that they plan to attend this pleasant and informative event, for which admission is free, but he has yet to receive their confirmation. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 2:52 pm by Geoff Schweller
Currently, as ruled by the Supreme Court in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
In 2000, she published Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation, and in 2010, she took the stand in Perry v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
In 2000, she published Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation, and in 2010, she took the stand in Perry v. [read post]
As Lord Hope said, whether, and on what grounds, Acts of the Scottish Parliament are amenable to judicial review “is a matter of very great constitutional importance” that “goes to the root of the relationship between the democratically-elected legislatures and the judiciary“. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  Last week I was critical of the 8th District’s decision in Strongsville v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm by ricelawmd_3p2zve
The justices in the Court of Appeals of Maryland admitted it is unpopular but declined to change it in the 2013 hearing of Coleman v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  People think private law = property all the time, and that’s not the case.INS v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Even in the follow-up order in Wheaton College v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reason, Damon Root maintains that, “[a]pplied on its face, the federal prohibition against encouraging illegal immigration for financial gain” at issue in United States v. [read post]