Search for: "People v. Stamps"
Results 761 - 780
of 816
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
The person preparing the report is also likely to have access to those people most knowledgeable about the incident at a time the incident is fresh in mind. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Thomas I.ROCKLAND COUNTYCriminal PracticeProsecutors Fail to Comply With Notice Requirements Under CPL §190.50[5]People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Fix your mistakesJackson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:14 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:15 pm
United States, and No. 08-5316, Mendoza v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 6:35 pm
US v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 11:58 pm
The NFP case is Mitchell Jackson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:43 am
One of the things that people find most shocking is how disrespectful police seem when they arrive to execute a search warrant. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:04 pm
Stamp v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
Crist v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:39 pm
In his dissent in yesterday's Boumediene v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
A simple hypothetical drawn from the facts in San Antonio v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:12 am
This all changed when the highest criminal court in Texas ruled in Beeman v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Under California law, a statute enacted by the people through the initiative process may not be repealed or superseded through ordinary legislation. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 6:12 am
Reading the Connecticut Supreme Court case of Curry v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:06 pm
See Yan Chen v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Take, for example, O'Brien v. [read post]
