Search for: "People v. Weight" Results 761 - 780 of 3,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2020, 7:19 am by Eric Goldman
” The court rejected the patient’s anti-SLAPP motion because the remarks were provably false, not just opinions. * Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm by Matthias Weller
A similar approach (with different outcome) has been taken in Ribeiro v Wright, 2020 ONSC 1829, Court of Ontario, Canada. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 6:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recently Court of Appeal decision in Stewart v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Post Scriptum ● Dirk Voorhoof, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression expert, has published a five year retrospective on the impact of the seminal Delfi v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Last Thursday, New York's intermediate appellate court in People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
 One of them, in addition to the relative weight we put on political structures as against political culture, is the degree to which there is at present any truly satisfactory theory of "the public interest," "common good," or "public good. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm by Alexander Volberding
§ 826.21) Overview of how to provide paid leave at specified levels, and the application of an “average” regular rate of pay in providing such paid leave based on a weighted average calculation of weekly regular rates of pay over the past six (6) months or the duration of the employment where the employee has worked for less than six months. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
In July, JP Morgan also cut the weighting of Venezuelan bonds to “zero-weight”, causing prices to fall and forcing holders to sell their positions at severely distressed prices. [read post]