Search for: "Person et al"
Results 761 - 780
of 8,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 6:00 am
Accordingly, the Commissioner dismissed the Petitioner's appeal, citing Appeal of Kaufmann, et al., 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,250 and Appeal of Budich and MacDonald, 54 id., Decision No. 16,774. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:32 am
BURGOS, ET AL. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:24 am
Facts: This case (Griffith et al v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:22 pm
The City of New York, et al. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 2:15 pm
The class action, filed in 2012 (Sidney Reid, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:43 pm
Autozone, Inc. et al. (2008), the California Court of Appeal in the Second Appellate District, confirmed that California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971, California Civil Code § 1747.08 (hereinafter, the “Act”) does not apply to a refund for the return of merchandise purchased by credit card. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
Herbert et al.. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
Bonan Huang, et al., supra. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:57 am
., et al, 2012 WL 688552 (9th Cir. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:16 am
Boomershine et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:26 am
We argue that persons have an underlying predisposition to use collective dimensions, such as common identities and a public voice, in thinking and expressing themselves politically. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 11:17 am
Twistee Treat USA et al., recently before Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 11:17 am
Twistee Treat USA et al., recently before Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:33 am
The Georgia Supreme Court issued a landmark decision today, in FLORES et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:08 pm
Louis, et al. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:49 am
ABP, Hoge Raad (Dutch Supreme Court) 2 December 1994, NJ 1995, 288, and Constance et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:00 pm
., B-401596, et al, Sept. 21, 2009, the GAO sustained a protest against the pre-qualification of a vendor on the grounds that the Department of State’s (DOS) determination that the vendor satisfied the qualification requirements of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 (Security Act) was unreasonable. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
Cathy Benko, et al., the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded that the plain language of an insured's underinsured motorist provision in the policy "would lead an ordinary policyholder to believe that they were required to bring a bodily injury claim against the alleged tortfeasor within the applicable statute of limitations. [read post]
