Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 761 - 780
of 55,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm
(Kansas City v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:09 am
Lopez v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:55 am
In both cases we must ask whether the President's action is authorized by Congress (in which case the President's power is at its height), whether it is in defiance of Congress (in which case the President's power is at its "lowest ebb"), or whether it exists in a "twilight zone" where Congress has not clearly spoken (These categories are drawn from Justice Jackson's famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm
Here is the abstract: National Federation of Independent Businesses v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:59 pm
The Supreme Court on Monday granted cert. in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:38 am
Regina v B (F); Same v P (A); Same v C (J) [2010] EWCA Crim 1857; [2010] WLR (D) 21 “A judge sitting in the Crown Court had no power to quash an indictment simply because he did not believe that the proceedings were appropriately brought or were not in the public interest when compared with his assessment of the needs of other cases and that had not changed as a result of the introduction of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2010. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 8:55 pm
The Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:30 am
In Metzgar v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:15 am
Yesterday’s opinion in Mission Product Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 12:36 pm
The case is Jameka Evans v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:20 am
Regina v Rollins [2010] UKSC 39; [2010] WLR (D) 210 “The power of the Financial Services Authority to institute criminal proceedings was not limited to the offences referred to in ss 401 and 402 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000; in particular the FSA had power to prosecute offences of money laundering under ss 327 and 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:05 pm
The facts of Attorney General v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:44 am
In Lancaster v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 8:36 pm
[Banton]; Egli v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:35 am
Forman v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 9:11 am
Texas, which raises a major question about the limits of executive power. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am
” These powers can be broadly described as forms of communications surveillance or surveillance of communications data. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Joshi and others v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Circuit in Narenji v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 12:41 pm
Supreme Court history, Lochner v. [read post]
