Search for: "Price v. Superior Court" Results 761 - 780 of 1,085
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2024, 4:30 am by Peter A. Mahler
Estate of Caruso v Caruso is one of those cases, fought in the setting of a realty holding general partnership, that went up to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:57 am by Marie Louise
Sandoz, Inc (IPBiz) (Patent Docs) Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Brazil: Superior Court of Justice denies Plavix patent extension (IP tango) Prandin (Repaglinide) – US: Novo Nordisk and Sandoz settle infringement claims in Prandin dispute (Patent Docs) Prandin (Repaglinide) – US: Supreme Court petitioned to review Federal Circuit patent use code decision: Caraco v Novo Nordisk (FDA Law Blog) [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:42 am by Ann Carlson
What is especially interesting about the court case, Associated Irritated Residents v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:40 am by Larry Downes
  Offering superior service, an ever-growing menu of new options and features, and competitive pricing also works just fine. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed at length here, both the Ninth Circuit and the California state courts upheld the finding of continuing state court jurisdiction for ’33 Act claims in connection with the Luther v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:05 am by Dylan Gibbs
The course has a $250 price tag but satisfies two years’ worth of CPD. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:00 am by Alyson Grine
I’m aware of one case in which a North Carolina superior court judge found that the police had not been delegated the authority to trespass individuals from the grounds of an apartment complex. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:00 am by Alyson Grine
I’m aware of one case in which a North Carolina superior court judge found that the police had not been delegated the authority to trespass individuals from the grounds of an apartment complex. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Peter Mahler
” Georgia: Stock Redemption Agreement’s “Current Value” Pricing Provision Excludes Minority Discount Wallace v Wallace, 813 S.E.2d 428 [Ct. [read post]