Search for: "Prince v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 1,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2012, 6:21 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The ECHR Grand Chamber in a 12-5 vote concerning Axel Springer v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:10 am by Laya Maheshwari
Background: Jammu and Kashmir’s Special Status In 1947, the Indian subcontinent—newly independent from the British Empire—contained not just the “infant nations” of India and Pakistan but also nearly 600 princely states, which were given the option of acceding to either India or Pakistan or remaining independent. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on 20 and 21 July 2022, the Court of Appeal (Vos MR, Sharp P and King LJ) heard the appeal Guardian News and Media v Executor of HRH Prince Philip challenging the decision to exclude the press from the hearing in September 2021 regarding the will of Prince Philip. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  What harmony” Disharmony extends to one third of the Data Protection Regulation” – pointing out the degree of disagreement between Member States prior to the meeting. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:01 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In reliance on the minority position in Potash, the respondents pointed to the Nilsson decision (Nilsson v The University of Prince Edward Island) of a Human Rights Panel appointed under Prince Edward Island’s Human Rights Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 2:35 pm
A 19th century idea first articulated in Prince v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am by INFORRM
Forthcoming Appeals A number of data protection cases will be the subject of appeal hearings in 2018: TLT v Secretary of State for the Home Department – hearing 11 or 12 April 2018 Stunt v Associated Newspapers – hearing on 19 or 20 June 2018. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:18 pm by Steven G. Pearl
” (Ghazaryan, supra, 169 Cal.App.4th at p. 1536, 87 Cal.Rptr.3d 518; see also Prince v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:23 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Justices to Consider Whether Warhol Image is “Fair Use” of Photograph of Prince First off today, Ronald Mann at SCOTUSblog reports that, tomorrow, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is expected to hear arguments in the case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
Prince Harry was awarded £140,600 in damages to compensate him for the distressed he suffered as a result of the phone hacking. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 9:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Sarah Grant summarized the military commission proceedings at the Nov. 7 hearing in U.S. v. al-Nashiri. [read post]