Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm
An excerpt: So send a quick note to the reps of our state, And tell them everyone should be able to marry their soul mate. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:29 am
The opinion in US v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm
Johns River Management District In 2013, the Supreme Court enhanced property rights in the United States when it decided Koontz. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:02 am
It has hundreds of thousands of customers in the state and earns millions of dollars in revenue from the state each year. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
Hoehn, No. 11-16751 (9th Cir.) - United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
By Bradley Graveline and Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:40 pm
Sometimes experience is good, and sometimes it's good to instead get someone who perhaps brings a fresh perspective that's not been formed (and/or jaded) by prior work in the area.Which is why, for example, we don't have any service qualifications to become, say, President of the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:11 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
United States litigation challenging the Executive Order. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:29 am
Department of Agriculture holding that California raisin handlers could assert a takings claim as an affirmative defense to an enforcement action filed by the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:23 am
The court justifies its “plain language” approach “[b]ecause this case presents an issue of first impression in Wisconsin and there is no guidance from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am
It has taken the Supreme Court of the United States less than two months since a mid-October hearing and less than ten pages (counting only the opinion per se, not the two-page syllabus) to determine and explain that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit got the law on design patent damages fundamentally wrong. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:20 am
M-Tech acquired these drives from a broker in the United Statesand imported them into theUK. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:29 am
” the Circuit Court said the burden on Kraham’s employment is no more severe than those the United State Supreme Court upheld in U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:04 am
On a very quick read, it seems that the weird mandatory rules part of Judge Kozinski’s initial en banc majority opinion in CDT is now just part of a Kozinski concurrence to what has been relabeled a per curiam majority opinion. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:45 am
The Court explained that the United States Supreme Court is divided on whether a judicial action may constitute a taking. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:45 am
The Court explained that the United States Supreme Court is divided on whether a judicial action may constitute a taking. [read post]
