Search for: "ROMANS v. ROMANS"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 9:05 am
And that such a fiduciary relationship must exhibit the characteristics of:de facto control and dominance (Marmelstein, 11 NY3d at 21).Last week the Court of Appeal was faced with another breach of fiduciary claim by a congregant in Doe v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester, 2009 NY Slip Op 02264. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:33 pm
" [28] The remedy for violation of a non-compete agreement is either damages or an injunction. [29] Additionally, new employers may be held liable for hiring an employee who has signed a non-compete agreement with another employer. [30] V. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:21 am
Second, members of Mutharika's party, the Democratic Progressive Party (remember that joke about the Holy Roman Empire not being Holy, nor Roman, etc.?) [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:56 am
Donovan v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:40 am
Watson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 4:52 am
Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School is a Roman Catholic institution focused on digital learning. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:49 am
Williams v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:46 am
Advertisement And of course, as I have previously noted, there has been a transformation in the law on the religion clauses of the First Amendment, including a winning streak on religious liberty punctuated this term by the Court’s decisions regarding Covid restrictions in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:16 am
Malta-Roman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:16 am
Malta-Roman v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Verret, Sunil Wahal, and Roman Weil.) [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am
Science, but God v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
Yeah, I may prefer briefs that are double spaced and in Times New Roman font. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
This morning, in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
To the extent plaintiff's claim against PSC-CUNY arises from its appointment of plaintiff's allegedly negligent attorney and thus raises a distinct issue, his allegations constitute a claim that he was improperly represented by his union, which is untimely under CPLR 217(2)(a)'s four-month limitations period (see Roman v City Empls. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
To the extent plaintiff's claim against PSC-CUNY arises from its appointment of plaintiff's allegedly negligent attorney and thus raises a distinct issue, his allegations constitute a claim that he was improperly represented by his union, which is untimely under CPLR 217(2)(a)'s four-month limitations period (see Roman v City Empls. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:15 am
This would be similar to LaRussa v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:02 am
Posner brought up the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 8:44 am
Roman Catholic Archbishop, 280 U.S. 1, 16 (1929). [read post]
