Search for: "Rick Hasen"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
Finally, Rick Hasen shares the amicus brief he co-authored in the Wisconsin Right to Life case, being heard by the Supreme Court on April 25, in this post at Election Law Blog. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:33 am
Detailed explanation from NonProfit Times Philanthropy: 5 Things That Charities Learned in 2012 http://ow.ly/gtVO0 HuffPost Impact: The top stories from 2012 that moved people to action http://huff.to/YG60uh GOOD: Seven Trends in Social Change in 2012 - GOOD Gene: Final & temporary regulations on Type III supporting organizations issued by the IRS on 12/28/12 US GPO Rick Hasen: ELB: “States Target Politically Active Nonprofits”: Roll Call reports.… [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:51 am
Lyle Denniston covered the story for this blog; other coverage comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today and from Robert Barnes and Mark Berman of The Washington Post, while Rick Hasen discusses the case and the Court’s order at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:41 am
Bruce Ackerman is confident that the Justices blinked and that they will affirm Section 5's constitutionality when the inevitable next case reaches the Court.As I explain on Rick Hasen's blog, I have my doubts. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
UPDATE: Rick Hasen has some thoughts on the panel and the timing of the LCR reply. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:29 pm
.” A reader of the election law blog run by Rick Hasen, who is a University of California Irvine voting expert and author, also noted the bigoted aspects of the Patterson ruling last month. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
At LegalTimes.com, Rick Hasen discusses the upcoming campaign finance case, FEC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:43 am
Campaign Finance “A New Era for Pay-to-Play” by Jason Abel on Rick Hasen’s Election Law Blog. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 6:42 am
A follow-up to last week's Blawg Review by Ed Still at Votelaw, Rick Hasen's web log brings a round-up of posts regarding the election outcome and process. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
Thanks to Jeffrey Redfern for first pointing me to Rick Hasen’s posts. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
” In another post at his Election Law Blog, Hasen covers the denial of review in a Hawaii campaign finance case. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:18 am
As Rick Hasen has noted, the Court is likely to focus on these threshold questions and — if the Court reverses the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:34 am
Rick Hasen responds to that criticism at his Election Law Blog, describing himself as “truly puzzled” by the post, while Michael McGough does the same in an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:51 am
At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen points out that one of “the first ways that Justice Scalia’s absence will be felt in Court decisions is on emergency motions and stay request which make its way to the Supreme Court on an expedited basis, what Prof. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:26 am
” At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen notes that Justice Stephen Breyer’s dissenting opinion in McCutcheon v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:25 am
Over at the Election Law blog, Loyola’s Rick Hasen has some interesting thoughts on how the confirmation process for Justice Souter’s replacement might play out, especially in light of Senator Arlen Specter’s recent defection to the Democratic party. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am
At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen discusses Justice Antonin Scalia’s recent mischaracterization, in his dissent, of an earlier case that he authored; Hasen then uses the mistake as a jumping-off point from which to discuss “another kind of mistake: where a Court opinion mischaracterize[s] the law in a way that changes the law in a major way, perhaps through inadvertence. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
” Hasen’s concern for Kopf’s judgment is endearing. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Rick Hasen responds to Liptak’s analysis at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 3:58 am
At Election Law Blog, lawprof Rick Hasen writes: A judge who blogs should not say “STFU” to the Supreme Court. [read post]
