Search for: "Rick Hills"
Results 761 - 780
of 896
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2009, 8:24 am
The piece itself is enjoyable and, in my view, does a nice job not only of describing what Brannon calls the New Doctrinalism but responding to some of the early criticisms of this school, including those by our own Rick Hills. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 7:22 pm
Its author will join a panel that will include Professors Mitch Berman, Rick Hills, and Keith Whittington, among others. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 3:03 pm
Rick Hills (PrawfsBlawg) has more on the bill, and on why it's unconstitutional.... [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:43 pm
What Rick Hills (correctly, I think) called "the Connecticut legislature's preposterously unconstitutional attack on Catholicism" appears to have been tabled, for now. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:58 am
Rick Hills beat me to the punch, and called our attention to the "preposterously unconstitutional" proposal in Connecticut that would impose on the Catholic Church new internal-governance structures. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:28 am
Rick Jones, R-Grand Ledge, who with Rep. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:20 pm
From Rick Hills at Prawfsblawg: The ambiguity of the "honest services" provision of the federal Mail Fraud statute (18 U.S.C. section 1346) has for decades been an open invitation to federal prosecutors to expand their sway over the political process... [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:01 am
President, couldn't you have waited an hour and bumped One Tree Hill instead? [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:12 pm
Richard Epstein (Chicago) versus Rick Hills (NYU), moderated by John McGinnis (Northwestern), sponsored by the Federalist Society, on audio and video (via Stier/Mass Tort Prof).... [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 10:15 am
Professor John McGinnis (Northwestern) is moderator for a January 9, 2009 Federalist Society debate between Professors Richard Epstein (Chicago) and Rick Hills (NYU) on When Should FDA Regulation Preempt State Tort Liability. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:33 am
Kristol wasn't terrible on the NYT page, but he was rarely the source of both true and surprising views that Brooks and Safire often are/were for the rightish side of the aisle.So, David Shipley, as you and Andrew Rosenthal determine who should fill that slot, and assuming you want someone to provide some intellectual and political diversity to the page, let me offer a half-hearted nomination: Rick Hills. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:44 pm
Rick Hills at Prawfsblawg finds it easy to believe tales of hardball tactics on both sides in union certification elections, of a sort few would deem acceptable in school board elections, and wonders whether the whole metaphor of "workplace democracy"... [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:28 pm
Rick Bickhram: And I'm Rick Bickhram. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 5:30 am
" Rick Hills, meanwhile, proposed in this post on PrawfsBlawg a "professors' nonaggression pact" against any academic nominees advanced by President-elect Obama because "literally any law prof -- is likely to be as good as, or even a better than, the typical nominee to a lower court, whose qualifications typically amount to being a Senator's friend or staffer. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 8:22 am
Rick Hills (NYU), one of the more thought-provoking and provocative thinkers over at PrawfsBlawg, has an interesting post on the interaction between the democratic process and the law of ERISA preemption. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 8:48 pm
The issue (and the offprint) includes a set of fascinating responses by our own Rick Hills and Michael O'Hear, and a reply by us. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:49 pm
Another rousing performance at PrawfsBlog by Professor Hills! [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:35 pm
Rick Hills at Prawfsblawg has some historical perspective on NYC's fiscal plight.... [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:27 am
Rick Hills is at it again. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 9:05 pm
And Rick Hills believes that, given all of this, there is little reason to search for a proper legal answer; instead the question is one of trust: do we think that the courts will get it right or that Treasury will. [read post]
