Search for: "SEC v. Downe" Results 761 - 780 of 1,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2015, 7:15 am by John Jascob
The group said its members would bear the adverse consequences of striking the preemption provision, a result sought by the states of Montana and Massachusetts in their suit against the SEC (Lindeen v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:49 am by John Jascob
Finally, the SEC advised the court that it may be delayed by unforeseen events such as a government shut-down, relevant international developments, or unexpected legal developments. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-09-26 http://t.co/XEClcqHkmh -> Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-09-26: NZ lawyers spent 29,334 hours and $3M-plus trying to pros… http://t.co/6zSIK4ZmJw -> Megaupload ignored take down warnings https://t.co/ASah6Pm51s #googlealerts #feedly -> 'Lenz': Can a Machine Consider Fair Use http://t.co/xMsMqogmrr -> Erotica and Copyrights – There is Nothing called Free Porn http://t.co/8cmTsISM7K ->… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:30 am
            We have not posted for a while—that day job can really get in the way sometimes—so we agreed to tackle the ridiculously long decision in Christiansen v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
The reason for the outside salesman exemption, the court noted, was explained in Christopher v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 4:29 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Prudential–Bache Sec., Inc., 821 F.2d 581, 586 (11th Cir.1984); Sutton v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 1:27 pm by D. Daxton White
But feel free to send us questions to our website at WallStreetversusMainStreet.com or Wall Street V MainStreet.com and we’ll try to answer those in a future show. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
[But under sec. 230], that is not content development, but publication. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
The “Sister Wives” family challenged the law (represented by George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley), and a federal district court in Utah struck the law down on free exercise clause grounds, largely reasoning that the law was motivated by hostility to polygamist Mormons. [read post]