Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF J. S." Results 761 - 780 of 15,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the States lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the States adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting little decision on whether contractual waivers of negligence liability are enforceable in recreational contexts: Yes as to zip-lining, under Colorado law, says Judge William J. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:11 pm
Stillman, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607, McLachlin J., in dissent, but not on this point, stated that "[t]he purpose of s. 8 is to protect the person and property of the individual from unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
For example, Georgia’s taxpayers reach the states sixth and highest bracket at $7,000 in taxable income. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Helfand; keynote addresses by Michael J. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Jason M. Halper
Although not expressly stated in the bench ruling, the absence of other potential bidders emerging over a five-month period appears, at least in part, to have led the Court to make a “relatively modest” adjustment to the deal by enjoining the stockholder vote for 30 days, during which time the C&J board “shall solicit interest. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Jennings, 2015 ONSC 237 [30] In view of the almost absolute nature of the privilege, competing interests are much less relevant, and indeed, as stated by Major J. in McClure, a balancing of interests is not appropriate. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 6:13 am by Dennis Crouch
Walterscheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 2), 76 J. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 7:46 am by Roel van Woudenberg
By submission dated and received on 9 November 2018, the appellant requested further processing under Article 121 EPC and stated that the prescribed fees had been paid via bank transfer to the EPO's bank account. [read post]