Search for: "STATE v FRANCIS"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Francis v LB Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 1418 This was a brave attempt to try and get something out a local authority's mistaken denial of a right to buy application, but it was not one which the Court of Appeal had any truck with. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:19 am
Supreme Court McGowan (Procurator Fiscal) v B (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 54 (23 November 2011) Jude v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 55 (23 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Samarenko v Dawn Hill House Ltd [2011] EWCA civ 1445 (01 December 2011) Oso v Newham University Hospital NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 1423 (01 December 2011) Francis v London Borough of Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 1418 (01 December 2011)… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:14 am
Broekman, Francis J. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:32 am
It’s not hard to find support for that view if you compare United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Hutchison v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
* Sam Francis Foundation v eBay complaint: Class action suit against eBay under CA's "resale royalty" statute [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
In Whren v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 11:54 am
Francis v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
The New York Court of Appeals will hear oral argument on this question on November 15 in Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:54 pm
SC10-1350, and Francis v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:35 am
Bevilacqua v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
B.J. 20 (2007) Francis X. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
B.J. 20 (2007) Francis X. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:05 am
Bevilacqua v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
Bank v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Francis Hotel in San Francisco. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 2:10 pm
The claimant must show at least a "strong prima facie case" and the balance of convenience test in American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon [1975] AC 396, does not apply, see Francis v The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2003] EWCA Civ 443-paragraph 16. [read post]
