Search for: "STATE v MURPHY" Results 761 - 780 of 2,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2008, 11:30 am
Plaintiff WinWare is represented by Thomas, Kayden, Horstemeyer & Risley, LLP of Atlanta.Peach State Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:05 am by Anonymous
View the original article here.Recently, in a 6-to-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Murphy v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 3:03 pm by Sean Kirby and Danielle Thompson
As previously stated, the Act will go into effect on October 29, 2018. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:46 pm by Benjamin Beaton
The dissent (Murphy, J.) objected to the court’s encroachment on state policymaking prerogative. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]