Search for: "Scales v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 2,619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Jeff Carroll
By contrast, Benesh noted that every time a United States President makes a big decision, it eats away at his public approval rating. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
In 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
And it cannot prevent Congress from determining who the rightful electors are and discharging its exclusive responsibility to say who will serve as the next President of the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
The treatise is the standard reference in antitrust and the common-law nature of antitrust in the United States makes the treatise particularly influential. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
People in the United States are flocking to cities and rubbing shoulders at greater rates than ever before. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
People in the United States are flocking to cities and rubbing shoulders at greater rates than ever before. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
At minimum, the implementation of all provisional measures should be a condition before the United States, or any country, considers further military or diplomatic support of Israel. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:39 am by Zahavah Levine
To address the surge in demand for mail voting, election officials across the United States have been scrambling to scale vote-by-mail operations and to work with state legislatures and governors to adapt the rules and procedures for mail voting during the coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
The sanctions are part of a “maximum pressure campaign” by the White House meant to force North Korea to negotiate with the United States over aspects of its nuclear program. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:00 am
Although self-described as an alternative assessment of the impact of recent Supreme Court punitive damage decisions, the article ultimately echoes the refrain advanced by, among others, members of the defense bar immediately following the United States Supreme Court's decision in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
That's no excuse at all; when the United States Attorney endows lawyers with the powers of federal prosecutors, he has a responsibility to properly train and supervise them so as to avoid trampling defendants' rights. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:36 pm by Sarah Dunaway
The year 2016 marks the recent celebration of fifty years of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and is a year that will usher in a new President of the United States. [read post]