Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2018, 12:00 am
To properly claim violation of rules, the SEC must allege the defendant directly or indirectly: 1) employed devices, schemes, or artifices to defraud; 2) made untrue statements of material facts and failed to state material facts necessary to make those statements not misleading; and 3) engaged in acts which would operate as a fraud upon other persons, including buyers and sellers of securities The SEC alleged Chang acted with scienter by opening a nominee brokerage account which… [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:27 am
Lord Clarke went on to opine that subrogation to the unpaid vendor’s lien was the appropriate remedy to be deployed: “The answer is that the Bank is subrogated to the unpaid seller’s lien. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Lenders Standing at Foreclosure Creadon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Assignee moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has issued the long-awaited decision in the case 08-964 Bilski et.al. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:52 pm
Services v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:52 pm
Services v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:23 am
To clarify the complex issue of internet sales taxes, the 2018 Supreme Court case South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 10:22 am
The prospective buyer (or is it seller?) [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:30 am
In Lindemann v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 11:16 am
A Second Circuit case, Tiffany v. eBay and Google v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 5:50 pm
Here is the Westlaw synopsis of a recent Second Circuit decision on personal jurisdiction based on Internet contacts, Chloe v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
But see Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:02 am
SnapRays, LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:10 am
Peper v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:13 am
Digital Ally, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:10 am
They further stated that sellers should not be required to pay a buyer’s agent commission because a buyer’s agent is not performing services on behalf of a seller. [read post]
