Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2015, 4:24 am
Sharp v Incorporated Village of Farmingdale, 129 A.D. 3d 821 (NYAD 2 Dept. 6/10/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Enforcement [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:28 pm
Sharpe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 2:14 am
"Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:32 am
It strikes me as a highly unusual and ideologically-driven opinion, not unlike Bush v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:14 pm
Supreme Court in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
Langley v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:29 pm
Capital Market Competitiveness, which argues for repeal of--or at least sharp limits on--securities class actions. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 7:31 am
Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 685, 105 S. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:58 am
Term has thus established a sharp contrast between EUO requests and IMEs. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:54 am
In the writ of certiorari, Oklahoma argued that Sharp v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:28 pm
(Juvenile Law; Indian Civil Rights Act)Sharp v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
YYG v PJK¸(11 March 2011), Sharp J. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm
See, e.g., McReynolds v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 2:02 am
A few days before the Apple v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp and Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm
Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp, Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:56 am
Dermatossian v New York City Tr. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
Decisions come down sooner only if a case is easily dismissed, and they take longer only under special circumstances such as when there are doubts over the validity of a patent and some guidance from the EPO (in an opposition proceeding) or the Federal Patent Court of Germany is expected in the meantime.Three more German cases are pending with the Dusseldorf Regional Court, but no trials have been scheduled yet in any of them:case no. 4c O 17/19 over EP2087629 on "a method of transmitting data… [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 2:32 am
In 2008, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided, New Jersey v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:18 pm
Sharp (1948), Brown v. [read post]