Search for: "Sharp v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
In the case of New Mexico v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
Accordingly, even though the express provisions acknowledging Presto’s proprietorship of the mark terminated upon settlement, the court still found that reliance on that state of affairs fell short of “the ethical standards of acceptable commercial behaviour. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
” (Kim v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm
An appeal against a decision of Langstaff J [2018] 3 WLR 691 17 or 18 October 2018, Butt v The Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:17 pm
The lawsuit, Almerico et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 5:14 pm
Last month in Public Discourse, Josh Craddock “called the question”: if Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:34 pm
"); State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
The Court Finds the Composition Claims Are Patentable Subject Matter Before making its determination, the Court traced the state of the law regarding § 101 by looking at the Supreme Court’s decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 8:14 pm
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 8:12 pm
…If these property owners in Northern Kentucky are smart, they’ll hire a sharp lawyer. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
On Tuesday, the Court accepted an appeal in Harris v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Oklahoma and Sharp v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
Sharpe); holding that the states may not apportion a chamber of their legislatures in the manner in which the United States Senate is apportioned (Reynolds v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
See, e.g., Sharp v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:05 am
Sharp, in 1948, long before the Supreme Court took the same step on federal constitutional grounds in Loving v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:12 pm
" United States v. [read post]
